The issue was an unnecessary synchronization when writing the output in the Parallel Chunk End when the "Columnar Backend" was set on the workflow.
Performance comparisons for 50M rows (data generator), with a par-chunker containing a row filter removing about 2/3 of the rows:
Runtime comparison (on my system):
- Parallel Chunk, 5.2.3 : 202s
- Parallel Chunk, 5.3 Nightly: 65s
- Plain Row Filter: 35s
(no par-chunker, just for reference)
To use this workflow in KNIME, download it from the below URL and open it in KNIME:
Download WorkflowDeploy, schedule, execute, and monitor your KNIME workflows locally, in the cloud or on-premises – with our brand new NodePit Runner.
Try NodePit Runner!Do you have feedback, questions, comments about NodePit, want to support this platform, or want your own nodes or workflows listed here as well? Do you think, the search results could be improved or something is missing? Then please get in touch! Alternatively, you can send us an email to mail@nodepit.com.
Please note that this is only about NodePit. We do not provide general support for KNIME — please use the KNIME forums instead.